1. Why it Matters for Best Outcomes

The method of cultivation is not just a technical choice — it defines the identity, sustainability, and market positioning of a farm. Traditionally, most farms followed chemical-intensive practices, but today farmers can choose organic, natural, regenerative, or mixed approaches. This decision affects soil health, water safety, input costs, yields, market acceptance, and long-term profitability. It has become one of the most critical indicators of how progressive or resilient a farm is.

2. When Method of Cultivation is Favorable

• Farms practicing balanced chemical use with precision maintain productivity while limiting harm.

• Organic or natural farms often enjoy healthier soils, reduced input costs over time, and niche market premiums.

• A mixed or transitional model (moving from chemical to organic) also provides stability — benefiting from both yield and long-term soil care.

Such approaches strengthen the farm’s reputation, reduce risks from market or policy shifts, and align with consumer demand for safe food.

3. When Method of Cultivation is Unfavorable

• Farms over-reliant on chemicals face soil degradation, rising costs, and health risks to crops, workers, and consumers.

• Unsustainable practices may damage water and biodiversity, creating long-term liabilities.

• On the other hand, poorly executed “organic” or “natural” farming — without proper training, certification, or planning — may lead to low yields and financial stress.

Thus, weak or extreme choices without management capacity hurt both sustainability and profitability.